The New God Argument is a logical argument for faith in God. Given assumptions consistent with contemporary science and technological trends, the argument proves that if we trust in our own superhuman potential then we should also trust that superhumanity probably would be more compassionate than we are and created our world. Because a compassionate creator may qualify as God in some religions, trust in our own superhuman potential may entail faith in God, and atheism may entail distrust in our superhuman potential.
Faith Assumption:
humanity will not become extinct before evolving into superhumanity
Compassion Argument
EITHER humanity probably will become extinct before evolving into superhumanity
OR superhumanity probably would not have more decentralized destructive capacity than humanity has
OR superhumanity probably would be more compassionate than we are
CO2
Superhumanity probably would have more decentralized destructive capacity than humanity has
CO3
Superhumanity probably would be more compassionate than we are
Creation Argument
CR1
EITHER humanity probably will become extinct before evolving into superhumanity
OR superhumanity probably would not create many worlds emulating its evolutionary history
OR superhumanity probably created our world
Superhumanity probably would create many worlds emulating its evolutionary history
(assumption)
CR3
Superhumanity probably created our world
(deduction from CR1, CR2, and F1)
God Conclusion
G1
BOTH superhumanity probably would be more compassionate than we are
AND superhumanity probably created our world
(deduction from CO3 and CR3)
https://new-god-argument.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment